Lindsay Schick focuses on matters involving investment management, consumer financial products, and consumer behavior. Ms. Schick has more than a decade of experience analyzing issues related to class certification, liability, and economic damages. She has substantial expertise with advanced statistical analyses of complex data. Ms. Schick consults during all phases of litigation and government and regulatory investigations, including expert discovery, data production, mediation, arbitration, and trial. Ms. Schick is actively involved in the firm’s research on Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) enforcement actions and publishes regularly on this topic. Her other research interests include consumer complaints to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), CFPB enforcement activity, and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing. Investments and ERISAMs. Schick has evaluated the performance and fees of investments in Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) class actions against retirement plans, Section 36(b) mutual fund excessive fee lawsuits, SEC investigations, and other matters. Her experience includes:
Consumer financeMs. Schick has analyzed lending practices and consumer behavior related to consumer financial products, such as mortgages, credit cards, and personal loans. Her experience includes:
Economic damagesMs. Schick has analyzed economic damages in breach of contract, intellectual property, and other commercial disputes. She has expertise with a variety of sophisticated analytical methods, including valuation and financial models, discounted cash flow (DCF) analyses, regression models, and other econometric analyses. Her experience includes:
Consumer fraud and product liabilityIn consumer class action lawsuits, Ms. Schick has evaluated class certification and loss causation issues related to disclosures, allegedly misleading advertising, and product defects. Her experience includes:
Pro bonoMs. Schick is active in Cornerstone Research’s pro bono practice. She estimated lost wages for an army veteran who was unable to complete his degree because his financial aid paperwork was not properly processed. The settlement reached in the matter was within the range of the damages amounts calculated by the expert she supported. ![]() ![]() |