In re FibroGen Inc. Securities Litigation
Defendants win at the class certification stage in this 10b-5 securities matter.
Arkansas Teacher Retirement System et al. v. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. et al.
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals instructed the district court to decertify the class in this securities class action litigation.
Indiana Public Retirement System v. AAC Holdings et al.
A federal judge denied class certification for one claim in this securities class action litigation. The case settled after the ruling.
Garcia et al. v. Volkswagen Group of America Inc. et al.
The judge ruled in favor of our client, denying class certification in this consumer fraud class action.
MacKinnon v. Volkswagen Group Canada Inc. et al.
Justice Edward Belobaba of the Ontario Superior Court denied class certification on the basis that the plaintiffs failed to establish an economic loss or a methodology for determining economic losses…
IntegrityMessageBoards.com v. Facebook Inc.
A judge denied plaintiff’s motion for class certification, citing Professor Hanssens’s expert report.
No-Poach Clauses in QSR Litigation
Class certification was denied in two seminal franchise no-poach litigation matters involving McDonald’s and Jimmy John’s.
Vignola v. FAT Brands Inc. et al.
The judge denied class certification in this securities class action alleging omissions in the prospectus of a Regulation A+ IPO.
Nelsen et al. v. Principal Global Investors Trust Company et al.
The parties agreed to voluntarily dismiss this case involving allegations of ERISA violations.
Invasion of Privacy Consumer Class Action
The court rejected the plaintiffs’ proposed conjoint survey in an invasion of privacy class action, and denied class certification in a related false advertising class action.
In re Niaspan Antitrust Litigation
The judge denied class certification in this pharmaceutical pay-for-delay multidistrict litigation.
Johannessohn et al. v. Polaris Industries Inc.
The court declined to certify the class in this product liability litigation, ruling that the plaintiffs had no standing and failed to fulfill predominance requirements.
How can we help you?
If you are looking for a publication not on our website, contact us.