Breach of Contract for a Branded Drug
Cornerstone Research and an affiliated expert analyzed the impact on a branded drug's value when a pharmaceutical company interrupted the supply and promotion of the drug.
Section 337 Unfair Import Investigation of Medical Devices
Cornerstone Research worked with a healthcare and competition expert in a patent infringement matter before the ITC.
In re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust Litigation
Cornerstone Research responded to allegations of price fixing for a manufacturer/supplier of polyurethane foam products.
Class Certification Opposed on Behalf of Healthcare Provider
The judge denied the motion for class certification in its entirety in this case involving claims that a service provider reordered physician diagnosis codes.
United States of America ex rel. Susan Ruscher et al. v. Omnicare Inc. et al.
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, granted summary judgment for the defendant in this case involving healthcare payment and billing practices.
Reverse Payments Settlement Analysis
Cornerstone Research works with pharmaceutical companies to address evolving antitrust issues in the context of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in FTC v. Actavis.
Anderson News LLC et al. v. American Media Inc. et al.
The judge in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York granted the defendants’ motions for summary judgment in this magazine distribution antitrust case.
Cornerstone Research Staff and Expert Sign Amici Curiae Brief for U.S. First Circuit
The brief addresses features of the settlement in Loestrin not yet addressed by courts reviewing alleged reverse payment settlements post-Actavis.
GE-Alstom Merger
Cornerstone Research analyzed the competitive implications of the target company’s financial position in GE’s multibillion-dollar acquisition of Alstom’s energy-related business.
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 880 Pension Fund et al. v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation et al.
The Tenth Circuit Appeals Court affirmed summary judgment based on lack of materiality in this securities class action.
Computer Sciences Corp. ERISA Litigation
The plaintiffs alleged that Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC) common stock was an imprudent investment option for the CSC Matched Asset Plan due to CSC’s option backdating practices and other tax-related…
In re BP p.l.c. Securities Litigation—December 2013 Ruling
The judge denied the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification based on the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Comcast v. Behrend in a securities class action.
How can we help you?
If you are looking for additional case experience examples, contact us.