Filter by:

Reset Filter
  • Intellectual Property
Showing 49 - 60 of 77
Case

ParaData Computer Networks v. Telebit

The defense retained Dr. Michael Keeley in this breach of technology sharing matter.

Case

Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc. et al. v. Connectix Corporation

Counsel for Connectix retained Dr. Michael Keeley to analyze the economic issues in this copyright infringement case.

Case

The Nature Company v. Natural Wonders

The Nature Company accused Natural Wonders of infringing its trade dress.

Case

CIM v. Wrigley

CIM sued Wrigley for an alleged breach of a joint software development agreement.

Case

Harris Corporation et al. v. Macronix International Co.

The plaintiff, Harris Corporation, had acquired a patent portfolio from General Electric and was seeking to realize value by widely licensing the patents.

Case

Intelectron, Inc. v. Heath Company, Inc.

Intelectron held patents on outdoor lighting fixtures with infrared motion detectors, and claimed that Heath, a much larger competitor, had infringed those patents, undercut the sales price, and earned unjust…

Case

Level One Communications, Inc. v. SEEQ Technology, Inc.

Level One sued SEEQ, claiming infringement of two of its patents, and SEEQ countersued, asserting that Level One had infringed one of its patents.

Case

MCI v. AT&T

MCI sued AT&T, claiming that certain AT&T patents covering intelligent network services were invalid.

Case

Polaroid Corporation v. Eastman Kodak Company

In the largest U.S. patent infringement case at the time, Polaroid claimed $12 billion in damages from Eastman Kodak, which it accused of infringing Polaroid’s instant camera patents.

Case

Scripto-Tokai Corporation v. The Gillette Company

In a matter involving erasable-ink pens, Scripto sued Gillette for declaratory relief, claiming Gillette’s patent was invalid.

Case

Surety Technologies, Inc. et al. v. Entrust Technologies, Inc.

Counsel for the defendant, Entrust Technologies, retained Dr. Michael Keeley, of Cornerstone Research in this patent infringement case.

Case

The Procter & Gamble Company v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation

In a case alleging infringement of a disposable diaper patent, the plaintiff, Procter & Gamble, presented a large damage claim based on “but-for” diaper purchases.

How can we help you?

If you are looking for a publication not on our website, contact us.