Abbott Laboratories v. Diamedix Corporation
Abbott Laboratories (Abbott) asked the court to declare that certain patents owned by Diamedix Corporation (Diamedix) were invalid and not infringed by Abbott’s products.
Compaq Computer v. eMachines
In 1999, Compaq Computer Corporation sued eMachines, Inc. and its Korean suppliers, TriGem Computer and Korea Data Systems, for infringement of thirteen Compaq patents.
IDX Systems Corporation v. Epic Systems Corporation et al.
IDX, a provider of healthcare information technology systems, sued several defendants alleging theft of trade secrets, breach of contractual obligations, unfair competition, and tortious interference.
Apple Computer, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation
Cornerstone Research staff were retained by the defendants to coordinate the damage analyses in this closely watched proceeding.
ParaData Computer Networks v. Telebit
The defense retained Dr. Michael Keeley in this breach of technology sharing matter.
Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc. et al. v. Connectix Corporation
Counsel for Connectix retained Dr. Michael Keeley to analyze the economic issues in this copyright infringement case.
The Nature Company v. Natural Wonders
The Nature Company accused Natural Wonders of infringing its trade dress.
CIM v. Wrigley
CIM sued Wrigley for an alleged breach of a joint software development agreement.
Harris Corporation et al. v. Macronix International Co.
The plaintiff, Harris Corporation, had acquired a patent portfolio from General Electric and was seeking to realize value by widely licensing the patents.
Intelectron, Inc. v. Heath Company, Inc.
Intelectron held patents on outdoor lighting fixtures with infrared motion detectors, and claimed that Heath, a much larger competitor, had infringed those patents, undercut the sales price, and earned unjust…
Level One Communications, Inc. v. SEEQ Technology, Inc.
Level One sued SEEQ, claiming infringement of two of its patents, and SEEQ countersued, asserting that Level One had infringed one of its patents.
MCI v. AT&T
MCI sued AT&T, claiming that certain AT&T patents covering intelligent network services were invalid.
How can we help you?
If you are looking for a publication not on our website, contact us.